![]() |
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE
UNIVERSITY
The University Faculty
Senate
AGENDA
Tuesday, December 5, 2000,
at 1:30 PM in
112 Kern Graduate Building
[In the case of severe weather conditions or other
emergencies, you may call the Senate Office at (814) 863-0221 to inquire if a
Senate meeting has been postponed or canceled.
This may be done after normal office hours by calling the same number
and a voice mail announcement can be heard concerning the status of any
meeting. You may also leave a message
at that time.]
A. MINUTES OF THE PRECEDING MEETING -
Minutes of the October 24, 2000, Meeting
in The Senate Record 34:2
B.
COMMUNICATIONS
TO THE SENATE - Senate Curriculum Report (Blue Sheets) of November 21,
2000
C. REPORT OF SENATE COUNCIL - Meeting of November 14, 2000
D. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE CHAIR -
E. COMMENTS
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY -
F.
FORENSIC
BUSINESS -
G. UNFINISHED BUSINESS -
H.
LEGISLATIVE
REPORTS –
Committees
and Rules
Revision
of Constitution, Article II, Section 1 (Membership)
Revision
of Standing Rules, Article II, Section 6(e)
Undergraduate
Education
Revision
of Senate Policy 42-27: Class Attendance
I.
ADVISORY/CONSULTATIVE
REPORTS –
University Planning
Recommendation for
Developing an Ecologically Sustainable University
J. INFORMATIONAL
REPORTS -
Admissions,
Records, Scheduling and Student Aid
Reserved Spaces Program
Faculty
Affairs
UniSCOPE 2000 Presentation
Undergraduate
Education
Summary of Student Petitions by College,
Unit or Location
University
Planning
Long-term
Debt and Debt Service of the University
A
Grand Destiny, The Penn State Campaign, Rodney Kirsch, Vice President for
Development and Alumni Relations
K.
NEW LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS -
L.
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE GOOD OF THE UNIVERSITY -
-----------------
Note:
The next regular meeting of the University Faculty Senate will be held
on Tuesday,
January 30, 2001, at 1:30 PM in Room 112
Kern Building.
The
Informational Report entitled “A Grand Destiny, The Penn State Campaign” will
be presented as the first informational report (under J.)
on the floor of the Senate.
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
The University Faculty Senate
101 Kern Graduate Building
University Park, PA 16802
(814) 863-1202 – phone (814) 865-5789 – fax
Date: November 17, 2000
To: Cara-Lynne Schengrund, Chair, University Faculty Senate
From: Louis F. Geschwindner, Chair, Senate Committee on Curricular Affairs
The
Senate Curriculum Report, dated
November 21, 2000, has been circulated throughout the University. Objections to any of the items in the report
must be submitted to the University Curriculum Coordinator at the Senate
Office, 101 Kern Graduate Building, e-mail ID sfw2@psu.edu,
on or before December 21, 2000.
The first list of editorial prerequisite
changes was published in the October 10, 2000, Senate Curriculum Report. The second and final list has been published
in the November 21, 2000, Report.
Each publication has listed over 400 editorial course prerequisite
changes. We encourage you to review the
listings.
The Senate Curriculum Report is available on the web. It can be accessed via the Faculty Senate home page (URL http://www.psu.edu/ufs). Since the Report is available on the web, printed copies are not distributed to the University community. An electronic mailing list is used to notify individuals of its publication. Please contact the Curriculum Coordinator at the e-mail ID indicated above if you would like to be added to the notification list.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES
AND RULES
Revision of
Constitution, Article II, Section 1 (Membership)
(Legislative)
(Implementation Date: Upon approval by the President)
The Senate Committee on Committees and Rules proposes the following change to the Constitution, Article II, Section 1:
Article II
Section 1
Membership
For the purpose of defining the
electorate of the Senate, the term University Faculty shall mean all persons who
are not candidates for degrees at Penn State, who hold full time academic
appointments, and who fall into one of the following categories: those holding
professorial, research (excluding noncontinuing research appointees), or librarian
titles and those who are full-time instructors, senior lecturers and lecturers,
or assistant librarians.
This rule has often been violated in the past, most often when people have sought graduate degrees in Higher Education. That, however, should not be a rationale, but support for the rationale, namely that the requirement is not necessary. The fear is that Senators will be guilty of a conflict of interest, but that is often the nature of whole committees such as Faculty Affairs and Faculty Benefits. The addition of Dickinson College of Law to Penn State has allowed professors in a number of fields to desire and pursue law degrees. They should not be penalized for this. Since Senators are asked by the Senate to disclose such degree pursuit, it would be simple for the voting units to request such information and for the electorate to make their own decisions bearing this information in mind if they wish.
COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES AND RULES
Mark A. Casteel, Vice-Chair
Joseph J. Cecere
Dwight Davis
Terry Engelder
Sabih I. Hayek
Deidre E. Jago, Chair
John R. Lippert
Arthur C. Miller
John W. Moore
Murry R. Nelson
John S. Nichols
Jean Landa Pytel
Dennis C. Scanlon
Cara-Lynne Schengrund
SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES AND RULES
(Legislative)
(Implementation: Upon Passage by the Senate)
The Faculty Senate of Penn State Great Valley School of Graduate Professional Studies has petitioned to have a representative on the Faculty Affairs Committee. The Committee on Committees and Rules has unanimously voted to support this petition.
Penn State Great Valley currently has two (2) Senators. To maintain consistency with other academic units, Penn State Great Valley should have representation on the Faculty Affairs Committee.
(e) Committee on Faculty Affairs
1. Membership:
(i) At least nineteen (19) elected
faculty Senators including at least one (1) faculty Senator from each college
at University Park and one (1) faculty Senator from each of Abington College,
Altoona College, Penn State Erie-The Behrend College, Berks-Lehigh Valley
College, Capital College, Commonwealth College, Dickinson School of Law, The
College of Medicine, and University Libraries.
(e) Committee on Faculty Affairs
1. Membership:
(i) At least TWENTY (20) elected
faculty Senators including at least one (1) faculty Senator from each college
at University Park and one (1) faculty Senator from each of THE FOLLOWING:
Abington College, Altoona College, Penn State Erie-The Behrend College,
Berks-Lehigh Valley College, Capital College, Commonwealth College, Dickinson
School of Law, The College of Medicine, GREAT
VALLEY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE PROFESSIONAL STUDIES, and University Libraries.
COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES AND RULES
Mark A. Casteel, Vice-Chair
Joseph J. Cecere
Dwight Davis
Terry Engelder
Sabih I. Hayek
Deidre E. Jago, Chair
John R. Lippert
Arthur C. Miller
John W. Moore
Murry R. Nelson
John S. Nichols
Jean Landa Pytel
Dennis C. Scanlon
Cara-Lynne Schengrund
SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION
(Legislative)
[Implementation Date: Fall 2000]
Background
Senate Policy 42-27 describes the importance of class attendance and exemptions to the class attendance policy. Official University excuses for attendance are only provided for University-approved curricular and extracurricular activities (such as field trips, debate trips, choir trips, and athletic contests). We believe that the University-approved Martin Luther King (MLK) Day of Service provides enriching learning experiences and should receive equal consideration under Senate Policy 42-27. By procedure, students will be expected to sign-up for The MLK Day of Service activities by the end of the prior fall semester and present the official University excuse form with an attached description of the activities at the beginning of the spring semester. The Martin Luther King Day of Service will be available across all Penn State locations through the Office of Student Affairs.
Rationale
The proposed amendment is intended to increase opportunity for community involvement by both students and faculty. The amendment is also intended to further three major goals of the MLK Day of Service initiative: increasing an appreciation for diversity and cultural awareness, increasing a sense of civic and social responsibility among all Penn Staters, and increasing an appreciation for civility and community. Last year was the first MLK Day of Service. Over 600 students participated in community service projects ranging from volunteering in K-12 schools in districts across the state to non-profit human service agencies. The number of students expected to participate in the coming year is expected to exceed the previous year’s involvement. The MLK Day of Service has been recognized as a University Sponsored event. It is therefore recommended that the term, The MLK Day of Service, be inserted into Senate Policy 42-27 to give both students and faculty the opportunity to become more involved in the community and further the goals of the initiative.
Recommendation
The Faculty Senate recommends the insertion of “The MLK Day of Service” within Senate Policy 42-27.
42-27 Class Attendance As Written
The faculty, staff, and other resources of the University are furnished for the education of students who attend the University. A class schedule is provided for students and faculty so that a reasonably orderly arrangement for instruction is facilitated. The fact that classes are scheduled is evidence that the faculty believes class instruction is important. Therefore, class attendance is important for the benefit of students.
Accordingly, it is the policy of the University that class attendance by students be encouraged and that all instructors organize and conduct their courses with this policy in mind. A student should attend every class for which the student is scheduled and should be held responsible for all work covered in the courses taken. In each case, the instructor should decide when the class absence constitutes a danger to the student's scholastic attainment and should make this fact known to the student at once. A student whose irregular attendance causes him or her, in the judgment of the instructor, to become deficient scholastically, may run the risk of receiving a failing grade or receiving a lower grade than the student might have secured had the student been in regular attendance.
Instructors should provide, within reason, opportunity to make up work for students who miss class for regularly scheduled, University-approved curricular and extracurricular activities (such as field trips, debate trips, choir trips, and athletic contests). However, if such scheduled trips are considered by the instructor to be hurting the student's scholastic performance, the instructor should present such evidence for necessary action to the head of the department in which the course is offered and to the dean of the college in which the student is enrolled or to the Division of Undergraduate Studies if the student is enrolled in that division.
Instructors also should provide, within reason, opportunity to make up work for student's who are obliged to miss classes for other legitimate reasons.
42-27 Class Attendance As Proposed
The faculty, staff, and other resources of the University are furnished for the education of students who attend the University. A class schedule is provided for students and faculty so that a reasonably orderly arrangement for instruction is facilitated. The fact that classes are scheduled is evidence that the faculty believes class instruction is important. Therefore, class attendance is important for the benefit of students.
Accordingly, it is the policy of the University that class attendance by students be encouraged and that all instructors organize and conduct their courses with this policy in mind. A student should attend every class for which the student is scheduled and should be held responsible for all work covered in the courses taken. In each case, the instructor should decide when the class absence constitutes a danger to the student's scholastic attainment and should make this fact known to the student at once. A student whose irregular attendance causes him or her, in the judgment of the instructor, to become deficient scholastically, may run the risk of receiving a failing grade or receiving a lower grade than the student might have secured had the student been in regular attendance.
Instructors should provide, within reason, opportunity to make up work for students who miss class for regularly scheduled, University-approved curricular and extracurricular activities (such as THE MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY OF SERVICE, field trips, debate trips, choir trips, and athletic contests). However, if such scheduled trips are considered by the instructor to be hurting the student's scholastic performance, the instructor should present such evidence for necessary action to the head of the department in which the course is offered and to the dean of the college in which the student is enrolled or to the Division of Undergraduate Studies if the student is enrolled in that division.
Instructors also should provide, within reason, opportunity to make up work for student's who are obliged to miss classes for other legitimate reasons.
Cheryl Achterberg
Richard L. Ammon
Theresa A. Balog
Dawn G. Blasko
Richard J. Bord
Ali Borhan
John J. Cahir
William J. Campbell
Paul F. Clark
Rebecca K. Corwin
Cheng Don
M. Margaret Galligan
David J. Green
Lynn Hendrickson
Gary L. Hile
Larry J. Kuhns
Jamie M. Myers, Chair
Laura L. Pauley
Robert D. Ricketts, V-Chair
Thomas A. Seybert
Carol A. Smith
Jane S. Sutton
Eric R. White
Jenny Zhang
PENN STATE___________________________________________________________
(Shield Logo Here) ALLOWED ABSENCE CARDS
ALLOWED ABSENCE BECAUSE OF ___THE MLK DAY OF
SERVICE_______
TO ALL INSTRUCTORS:
M__________________________________________________________________
Was
granted permission to be absent from college classes, practicums, and military
drill between
_____________19_________M, and _____________19_________M
This
student should not be penalized for the absence, but should be responsible for
any work missed.
_______________________________________
Sponsoring
Unit Chairman
A
description of the events the student will be attending on the MLK Day of
Service is provided in the attached sheet. The student must present this excuse
to each of his instructors within one college week of the last date named
above.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNIVERSITY PLANNING
Recommendation for Developing an Ecologically Sustainable University
(Advisory and Consultative)
In September 1998, a group of Penn State faculty, staff and students released The Penn State Indicators Report. This report did something that had never before been done--it examined Penn State through the lens of sustainability to evaluate whether the University was moving toward or away from sustainable practices. This analysis relied on thirty-four sustainability indicators in areas such as energy, food, water, waste, transportation, buildings, and decision-making.
The 1998 Indicators Report attracted both local and national attention and in late 1999 the "Indicators" group created Penn State's Green Destiny Council, a faculty-staff-student association committed to promoting ecological responsibility at Penn State. The Green Destiny Council believes that institutions of higher education can be leverage points in the transition to a sustainable society in so far as they model sustainable practices and foster ecological literacy.
In April 2000, the Green Destiny Council released Indicators 2000, an update of the original 1998 Indicators Report (http://www.bio.psu.edu/Greendestiny/indicators.shtml). The new report cites some improvements at Penn State but makes it clear that there is still a considerable sustainability deficit at our university. The Report suggests that the time has come to join Penn State's individual environmental initiatives into a comprehensive Ecological Mission.
What would an Ecological Mission look like for Penn State? Simply stated, it would define the pre-conditions for genuine sustainability at Penn State. For example, in the area of energy use, an essential precondition for long-term sustainability is the significant reduction in university's reliance on fossil fuels. The unrestrained use of fossil fuels throughout the world causes air pollution, acid precipitation, chronic health problems, and, very likely, climate change. American universities, like Penn State, are in a position to set an example to students, business and society in general of ecological responsibility by articulating an ecological mission which includes a commitment to reduce fossil fuel dependence. Indeed, leading the way on this important effort is intimately related to the mission of a great university. In fact it is paramount that we, the University, set an example for our students on being ecologically sustainable.
Another precondition for genuine sustainability is the adoption of practices that dramatically reduce waste. At present, Penn State continually receives products from distant sources, consumes these products, and then funnels enormous quantities of waste to distant landfills. Instead Penn State needs, as a component of its long-term ecological mission, the clear intent to minimize solid, liquid and hazardous wastes.
A comprehensive ecological mission for Penn State would also include long-term targets in the realms of water conservation, land stewardship, low-impact transportation, sustainable food production, and "green" building construction.
Of course, all of us in the Penn State community recognize that there will be up-front costs involved in doing such things as reducing dependence on fossil fuels, promoting zero-waste technologies, and constructing "green" buildings, but we also know that waste is expensive and that up-front investments in sustainable practices might pay off over the long-term, especially if environmental and social costs were calculated and educational benefits were tallied.
Another major result of the University adopting a policy and actions in regards to sustainability is the impact on students. Indeed, some would say that this is the most important outcome. If the University sets an example of sustainability it would be a powerful role model for our students and greatly multiply the effects of the undertaking. Graduates having experienced living in such an environment while attending Penn State will carry this orientation with them throughout their lives and influence other individuals and organizations.
There is a need for Penn State to develop long term goals in regards to ecological sustainability and to incorporate them into the University’s Strategic Plan. These goals would encourage all sectors of the University to explore resource-use options that are more conserving, healthful, and efficient. It is our sincere hope that the Faculty Senate will endorse the recommendation listed below which supports the Green Destiny Council's general ecological mission policy statement. By doing so, we will set an example for our students and society on how to meet the many environmental challenges of today and in the future. Supporting ecological sustainability will not only promote environmental improvements within the University and Pennsylvania, but also economic health. As Senator Gaylord Nelson put it, “the environment is the economy.” By adopting a strong position on these issues, our University will stand out as a leader on this front. This leadership role will attract students, faculty and funding for the University in addition to enhancing Pennsylvania’s reputation with regard to environmental stewardship.
The Faculty Senate hereby recommends that Penn State incorporate, to the fullest extent possible, the following LONG-TERM GOALS into all future University Strategic Plans.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNIVERSITY PLANNING
P. Richard Althouse
William J. Anderson, Jr.
Anthony J. Baratta, V-Chair
Michael J. Cardamone
David Chao
Peter Deines, Chair
Peter B. Everett
William M. Frank
Daniel R. Hagen
Ali R. Hurson
Ernest W. Johnson
Daniel G. Kiefer
Rodney Kirsch
Robert N. Pangborn
Louise E. Sandmeyer
Michael C. Saunders
Gary C. Schultz
Marley W. Watkins
Beno Weiss
Daniel E. Willis
SENATE COMMITTEE ON ADMISSIONS, RECORDS,
SCHEDULING AND STUDENT AID
(Informational Report)
"Reserved
Spaces" represent spaces at the University Park Campus reserved for
eligible freshmen with special needs that cannot be met at non-University Park
locations. These spaces are generally
for students whose predicted GPA's are below the cutoffs for regular fall
admissions for University Park.
In
nearly all cases, students admitted at the University Park Campus through the
Reserved Spaces Program meet the basic admission standards of the
University. In some instances, it is
not possible to calculate a predicted GPA (there were 4 such cases in
2000). This is sometimes the issue for
an international student. There are, on
occasion, special circumstances that warrant dropping below the 2.00 minimum
predicted GPA, although there were no cases of this in 2000 admissions.
A
large number of the reserved spaces (50% in 2000) are for specially talented
students in such areas as athletics, the arts and the Blue Band. Most of these students contribute uniquely
both to the educational and cultural life of the entire University Park community. Spaces are also reserved for veterans, those
entering under the Educational Opportunity Program (EOP) and those entering the
recently instituted College Assistance Migrant Program (CAMP). These three groups, along with Arts and
Architecture talent admits, are Senate approved. Two other general classifications account for the remaining
students admitted through the Reserved Spaces Program. "Other Academic" admissions
involve students granted entrance by the Office of Undergraduate Admissions' Admissions
Review Committee, and students on ROTC scholarships. Administrative admissions include athletes, members of the Blue
Band, and a few additional administrative spaces.
The
first table contains data giving a profile of admissions through the Reserved
Spaces Program for six of the years since the program began in 1984. During this time, the approved maximum for
the program has been reduced and the number actually admitted each year through
the program has been below the approved limit.
In 2000, 5.81% of the entering fall semester freshman class at
University Park was admitted through the Reserved Spaces Program. This is a substantial reduction from 1984,
both in absolute number and percentage of new freshmen. The second table provides a distribution by
category over the same six years.
The
third table indicates the distribution of admissions through the Reserved
Spaces by admission category (predicted GPA) for each general classification.
The last table displays the approved limits for Fall 2001
by specific category. These limits are
the same as those for 2000.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON ADMISSIONS, RECORDS SCHEDULING AND STUDENT AID
Deborah F. Atwater
Kevin R. Cheesbrough
JoAnn Chirico, Chair
Lynn E. Drafall
Peter Georgopulos, Vice Chair
Anna Griswold
Geoffrey J. Harford
Terry P. Harrison
Amanda Hudnall
Victor Nistor
P. Peter Rebane
John J. Romano
J. James Wager
Roger P. Ware
SENATE COMMITTEE ON FACULTY AFFAIRS
(Informational)
As distributed at the September 12 Senate meeting, the UniSCOPE Learning Community has developed a “multidimensional model of scholarship for the 21st century.” This report recognizes the three missions of the University – teaching, research, and service – as a continuum of scholarship. The UniSCOPE model serves as a basis for identifying, assessing, and rewarding the types of scholarship in the University.
After the December Senate meeting, the Faculty Affairs Committee will review the UniSCOPE report, examine its implications in the promotion and tenure process, and report to the Faculty Senate. For your information and access, the URL of the UniSCOPE report is: http://www.cas.psu.edu/docs/CASPROF/keystone21/uniscope/default.htm
SENATE COMMITTEE ON FACULTY AFFAIRS
Shelton S. Alexander
Syed S. Andaleeb
Kultegin Aydin
Ingrid M. Blood
Melvin Blumberg
Clay Calvert
Lynn A. Carpenter
Renee D. Diehl
James M. Donovan
Jacqueline P. Esposito
Dorothy H. Evensen
Veronique M. Foti
Margaret B. Goldman
Elizabeth A. Hanley
Ravinder Koul
Robert LaPorte
Sallie M. McCorkle
Louis Milakofsky, Chair
Victor Romero
William A. Rowe
Robert Secor
Jeffery M. Sharp
Stephen W. Stace
Kim C. Steiner
Valerie N. Stratton, V-Chair
SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION
Summary of Student Petitions by College, Unit or Location
(Informational)
The Senate through its committees has permitted students to petition for exceptions to the Senate academic rules found in the Academic Policies, Rules and Procedures for Students. Implementation and exceptions to these policies are the responsibility of the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Education unless otherwise assigned to another standing committee.
The committee regularly reports to the Senate on the type and number of student petition actions. This report provides a summary of petitions over the last two years and their sources by colleges and campuses.
The petition provides an opportunity for the student to receive consideration on extenuating circumstances affecting his/her progress. It is composed of a petition letter and transcript from the student, supporting documents from advisors, instructors, physicians or other appropriate personnel and a review statement by the student’s dean or campus executive officer. The final decision by the committee represents an effort to weigh the personal circumstances of the individual while maintaining the academic standards of the University.
Cheryl Achterberg
Richard L. Ammon
Theresa A. Balog
Dawn G. Blasko
Richard J. Bord
Ali Borhan
John J. Cahir
William J. Campbell
Paul F. Clark
Rebecca K. Corwin
Cheng Don
M. Margaret Galligan
David J. Green
Lynn Hendrickson
Gary L. Hile
Larry J. Kuhns
Jamie M. Myers, Chair
Laura L. Pauley
Robert D. Ricketts, V-Chair
Thomas A. Seybert
Carol A. Smith
Jane S. Sutton
Eric R. White
Jenny Zhang
SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION
For The Period 08/01/98 – 07/31/99
Miscellaneous:
Corrected Grades 31 31 0
Other 20 18 2
For The Period 08/01/99 – 07/31/00
Late Registration 286 284 2
Miscellaneous:
Corrected Grades 46 45 1
Other 24 24 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submitted |
|
Submitted |
|
% Increase |
|
Granted |
Denied |
|
|
|
|
|
1998-99 |
|
1999-00 |
|
in Petitions |
|
|
|
|
|
Abington College |
|
72 |
|
88 |
|
22% |
|
48 |
40 |
||
|
Agricultural Sciences |
|
43 |
|
61 |
|
42% |
|
46 |
15 |
||
|
Altoona College |
|
79 |
|
81 |
|
3% |
|
60 |
21 |
||
|
Arts & Architecture |
|
46 |
|
53 |
|
15% |
|
44 |
9 |
||
|
Beaver Campus |
|
7 |
|
7 |
|
0% |
|
5 |
2 |
||
|
Behrend College |
|
49 |
|
54 |
|
||||||