Penn State University Home  

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY

 

The University Faculty Senate

 

AGENDA

 

Tuesday, December 5, 2000, at 1:30 PM in

112 Kern Graduate Building

 

[In the case of severe weather conditions or other emergencies, you may call the Senate Office at (814) 863-0221 to inquire if a Senate meeting has been postponed or canceled.  This may be done after normal office hours by calling the same number and a voice mail announcement can be heard concerning the status of any meeting.  You may also leave a message at that time.]

 

A.  MINUTES OF THE PRECEDING MEETING -

      Minutes of the October 24, 2000, Meeting in The Senate Record 34:2

 

B.     COMMUNICATIONS TO THE SENATE - Senate Curriculum Report (Blue Sheets) of November 21, 2000                                  

 

C.  REPORT OF SENATE COUNCIL - Meeting of November 14, 2000

 

D.  ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE CHAIR -

 

E.  COMMENTS BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY -

 

 

F.      FORENSIC BUSINESS -

 

G.  UNFINISHED BUSINESS -

 

H.     LEGISLATIVE REPORTS –

 

        Committees and Rules

 

            Revision of Constitution, Article II, Section 1 (Membership)  

 

            Revision of Standing Rules, Article II, Section 6(e) 

 

        Undergraduate Education

 

            Revision of Senate Policy 42-27: Class Attendance      

 

I.        ADVISORY/CONSULTATIVE REPORTS –

 

  University Planning

 

    Recommendation for Developing an Ecologically Sustainable University  

 

J.      INFORMATIONAL REPORTS -

     

      Admissions, Records, Scheduling and Student Aid

 

            Reserved Spaces Program          

 

      Faculty Affairs

 

            UniSCOPE 2000 Presentation     

 

      Undergraduate Education

 

            Summary of Student Petitions by College, Unit or Location          

 

      University Planning

 

            Long-term Debt and Debt Service of the University  

 

            A Grand Destiny, The Penn State Campaign, Rodney Kirsch, Vice President for

            Development and Alumni Relations         

 

K.  NEW LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS -

 

L.  COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE GOOD OF THE UNIVERSITY -

 

 

-----------------

Note:  The next regular meeting of the University Faculty Senate will be held on Tuesday,

           January 30, 2001, at 1:30 PM in Room 112 Kern Building.

 

            The Informational Report entitled “A Grand Destiny, The Penn State Campaign” will

            be presented as the first informational report (under J.) on the floor of the Senate.

 

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY

The University Faculty Senate

101 Kern Graduate Building

University Park, PA  16802

(814) 863-1202 – phone   (814) 865-5789 – fax

 

Date:            November 17, 2000

 

To:      Cara-Lynne Schengrund, Chair, University Faculty Senate

 

From:  Louis F. Geschwindner, Chair, Senate Committee on Curricular Affairs

 

            The Senate Curriculum Report, dated November 21, 2000, has been circulated throughout the University.  Objections to any of the items in the report must be submitted to the University Curriculum Coordinator at the Senate Office, 101 Kern Graduate Building, e-mail ID sfw2@psu.edu, on or before December 21, 2000.

 

            The first list of editorial prerequisite changes was published in the October 10, 2000, Senate Curriculum Report.  The second and final list has been published in the November 21, 2000, Report.  Each publication has listed over 400 editorial course prerequisite changes.  We encourage you to review the listings.

 

            The Senate Curriculum Report is available on the web.  It can be accessed via the Faculty Senate home page (URL http://www.psu.edu/ufs).  Since the Report is available on the web, printed copies are not distributed to the University community.  An electronic mailing list is used to notify individuals of its publication.  Please contact the Curriculum Coordinator at the e-mail ID indicated above if you would like to be added to the notification list.

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES AND RULES

 

Revision of Constitution, Article II, Section 1 (Membership)

 

(Legislative)

 

(Implementation Date: Upon approval by the President)

 

 

Recommendation

The Senate Committee on Committees and Rules proposes the following change to the Constitution, Article II, Section 1:

 

Article II

Section 1

Membership

For the purpose of defining the electorate of the Senate, the term University Faculty shall mean all persons who are not candidates for degrees at Penn State, who hold full time academic appointments, and who fall into one of the following categories: those holding professorial, research (excluding noncontinuing research appointees), or librarian titles and those who are full-time instructors, senior lecturers and lecturers, or assistant librarians.

 

Rationale

This rule has often been violated in the past, most often when people have sought graduate degrees in Higher Education. That, however, should not be a rationale, but support for the rationale, namely that the requirement is not necessary. The fear is that Senators will be guilty of a conflict of interest, but that is often the nature of whole committees such as Faculty Affairs and Faculty Benefits. The addition of Dickinson College of Law to Penn State has allowed professors in a number of fields to desire and pursue law degrees. They should not be penalized for this. Since Senators are asked by the Senate to disclose such degree pursuit, it would be simple for the voting units to request such information and for the electorate to make their own decisions bearing this information in mind if they wish.

 

COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES AND RULES

Mark A. Casteel, Vice-Chair

Joseph J. Cecere

Dwight Davis

Terry Engelder

Sabih I. Hayek

Deidre E. Jago, Chair

John R. Lippert

Arthur C. Miller

John W. Moore

Murry R. Nelson

John S. Nichols

Jean Landa Pytel

Dennis C. Scanlon

Cara-Lynne Schengrund

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES AND RULES

 

Revision of Standing Rules, Article II, Section 6(e)

 

(Legislative)

 

(Implementation: Upon Passage by the Senate)

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The Faculty Senate of Penn State Great Valley School of Graduate Professional Studies has petitioned to have a representative on the Faculty Affairs Committee.  The Committee on Committees and Rules has unanimously voted to support this petition.

 

RATIONALE

 

Penn State Great Valley currently has two (2) Senators.  To maintain consistency with other academic units, Penn State Great Valley should have representation on the Faculty Affairs Committee.

 

PRESENT

 

(e)   Committee on Faculty Affairs

1.       Membership:

(i)            At least nineteen (19) elected faculty Senators including at least one (1) faculty Senator from each college at University Park and one (1) faculty Senator from each of Abington College, Altoona College, Penn State Erie-The Behrend Col­lege, Berks-Lehigh Valley College, Capital College, Com­monwealth College, Dickinson School of Law, The College of Medicine, and University Libraries.

PROPOSED

 

(e)   Committee on Faculty Affairs

1.       Membership:

(i)            At least TWENTY (20) elected faculty Senators including at least one (1) faculty Senator from each college at University Park and one (1) faculty Senator from each of THE FOLLOWING: Abington College, Altoona College, Penn State Erie-The Behrend Col­lege, Berks-Lehigh Valley College, Capital College, Com­monwealth College, Dickinson School of Law, The College of Medicine, GREAT VALLEY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE PROFESSIONAL STUDIES, and University Libraries.

 

COMMITTEE ON COMMITTEES AND RULES

Mark A. Casteel, Vice-Chair

Joseph J. Cecere

Dwight Davis

Terry Engelder

Sabih I. Hayek

Deidre E. Jago, Chair

John R. Lippert

Arthur C. Miller

John W. Moore

Murry R. Nelson

John S. Nichols

Jean Landa Pytel

Dennis C. Scanlon

Cara-Lynne Schengrund

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION

 

Revision of Senate Policy 42-27: Class Attendance

 

(Legislative)

 

[Implementation Date: Fall 2000]

 

Background

 

Senate Policy 42-27 describes the importance of class attendance and exemptions to the class attendance policy.  Official University excuses for attendance are only provided for University-approved curricular and extracurricular activities (such as field trips, debate trips, choir trips, and athletic contests).  We believe that the University-approved Martin Luther King (MLK) Day of Service provides enriching learning experiences and should receive equal consideration under Senate Policy 42-27.  By procedure, students will be expected to sign-up for The MLK Day of Service activities by the end of the prior fall semester and present the official University excuse form with an attached description of the activities at the beginning of the spring semester.  The Martin Luther King Day of Service will be available across all Penn State locations through the Office of Student Affairs.

 

Rationale

 

The proposed amendment is intended to increase opportunity for community involvement by both students and faculty.  The amendment is also intended to further three major goals of the MLK Day of Service initiative: increasing an appreciation for diversity and cultural awareness, increasing a sense of civic and social responsibility among all Penn Staters, and increasing an appreciation for civility and community.  Last year was the first MLK Day of Service.  Over 600 students participated in community service projects ranging from volunteering in K-12 schools in districts across the state to non-profit human service agencies.  The number of students expected to participate in the coming year is expected to exceed the previous year’s involvement.  The MLK Day of Service has been recognized as a University Sponsored event.  It is therefore recommended that the term, The MLK Day of Service, be inserted into Senate Policy 42-27 to give both students and faculty the opportunity to become more involved in the community and further the goals of the initiative.

 

Recommendation

 

The Faculty Senate recommends the insertion of “The MLK Day of Service” within Senate Policy 42-27.

 

42-27 Class Attendance As Written

 

The faculty, staff, and other resources of the University are furnished for the education of students who attend the University.  A class schedule is provided for students and faculty so that a reasonably orderly arrangement for instruction is facilitated.  The fact that classes are scheduled is evidence that the faculty believes class instruction is important. Therefore, class attendance is important for the benefit of students.

 

Accordingly, it is the policy of the University that class attendance by students be encouraged and that all instructors organize and conduct their courses with this policy in mind.  A student should attend every class for which the student is scheduled and should be held responsible for all work covered in the courses taken.  In each case, the instructor should decide when the class absence constitutes a danger to the student's scholastic attainment and should make this fact known to the student at once.  A student whose irregular attendance causes him or her, in the judgment of the instructor, to become deficient scholastically, may run the risk of receiving a failing grade or receiving a lower grade than the student might have secured had the student been in regular attendance.

 

Instructors should provide, within reason, opportunity to make up work for students who miss class for regularly scheduled, University-approved curricular and extracurricular activities (such as field trips, debate trips, choir trips, and athletic contests).  However, if such scheduled trips are considered by the instructor to be hurting the student's scholastic performance, the instructor should present such evidence for necessary action to the head of the department in which the course is offered and to the dean of the college in which the student is enrolled or to the Division of Undergraduate Studies if the student is enrolled in that division.

 

Instructors also should provide, within reason, opportunity to make up work for student's who are obliged to miss classes for other legitimate reasons.

 

42-27 Class Attendance As Proposed

 

The faculty, staff, and other resources of the University are furnished for the education of students who attend the University.  A class schedule is provided for students and faculty so that a reasonably orderly arrangement for instruction is facilitated.  The fact that classes are scheduled is evidence that the faculty believes class instruction is important. Therefore, class attendance is important for the benefit of students.

 

Accordingly, it is the policy of the University that class attendance by students be encouraged and that all instructors organize and conduct their courses with this policy in mind.  A student should attend every class for which the student is scheduled and should be held responsible for all work covered in the courses taken.  In each case, the instructor should decide when the class absence constitutes a danger to the student's scholastic attainment and should make this fact known to the student at once.  A student whose irregular attendance causes him or her, in the judgment of the instructor, to become deficient scholastically, may run the risk of receiving a failing grade or receiving a lower grade than the student might have secured had the student been in regular attendance.

 

Instructors should provide, within reason, opportunity to make up work for students who miss class for regularly scheduled, University-approved curricular and extracurricular activities (such as THE MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY OF SERVICE, field trips, debate trips, choir trips, and athletic contests).  However, if such scheduled trips are considered by the instructor to be hurting the student's scholastic performance, the instructor should present such evidence for necessary action to the head of the department in which the course is offered and to the dean of the college in which the student is enrolled or to the Division of Undergraduate Studies if the student is enrolled in that division.

 

Instructors also should provide, within reason, opportunity to make up work for student's who are obliged to miss classes for other legitimate reasons.

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION

                       


Cheryl Achterberg                  

Richard L. Ammon                       

Theresa A. Balog              

Dawn G. Blasko             

Richard J. Bord                       

Ali Borhan                               

John J. Cahir                           

William J. Campbell                     

Paul F. Clark                           

Rebecca K. Corwin            

Cheng Don                  

M. Margaret Galligan           

David J. Green

Lynn Hendrickson

Gary L. Hile

Larry J. Kuhns

Jamie M. Myers, Chair

Laura L. Pauley

Robert D. Ricketts, V-Chair

Thomas A. Seybert

Carol A. Smith

Jane S. Sutton

Eric R. White

Jenny Zhang    

 

PENN STATE___________________________________________________________

(Shield Logo Here)                             ALLOWED ABSENCE CARDS

 

 

 

ALLOWED ABSENCE BECAUSE OF ___THE MLK DAY OF SERVICE_______

 

TO ALL INSTRUCTORS:

 

M__________________________________________________________________

Was granted permission to be absent from college classes, practicums, and military drill between

 

_____________19_________M, and _____________19_________M

 

This student should not be penalized for the absence, but should be responsible for any work missed.

 

                                                                        _______________________________________

                                                                            Sponsoring Unit Chairman

 

A description of the events the student will be attending on the MLK Day of Service is provided in the attached sheet. The student must present this excuse to each of his instructors within one college week of the last date named above.

 

     SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNIVERSITY PLANNING

 

Recommendation for Developing an Ecologically Sustainable University

 

(Advisory and Consultative)

 

BACKGROUND

 

            In September 1998, a group of Penn State faculty, staff and students released The Penn State Indicators Report.   This report did something that had never before been done--it examined Penn State through the lens of sustainability to evaluate whether the University was moving toward or away from sustainable practices.    This analysis relied on thirty-four sustainability indicators in areas such as energy, food, water, waste, transportation, buildings, and decision-making. 

 

            The 1998 Indicators Report attracted both local and national attention and in late 1999 the "Indicators" group created Penn State's Green Destiny Council, a faculty-staff-student association committed to promoting ecological responsibility at Penn State.  The Green Destiny Council believes that institutions of higher education can be leverage points in the transition to a sustainable society in so far as they model sustainable practices and foster ecological literacy. 

 

            In April 2000, the Green Destiny Council released Indicators 2000, an update of the original 1998 Indicators Report (http://www.bio.psu.edu/Greendestiny/indicators.shtml).   The new report cites some improvements at Penn State but makes it clear that there is still a considerable sustainability deficit at our university.    The Report suggests that the time has come to join Penn State's individual environmental initiatives into a comprehensive Ecological Mission.   

 

            What would an Ecological Mission look like for Penn State?  Simply stated, it would define the pre-conditions for genuine sustainability at Penn State.  For example, in the area of energy use, an essential precondition for long-term sustainability is the significant reduction in university's reliance on fossil fuels.  The unrestrained use of fossil fuels throughout the world causes air pollution, acid precipitation, chronic health problems, and, very likely, climate change.  American universities, like Penn State, are in a position to set an example to students, business and society in general of ecological responsibility by articulating an ecological mission which includes a commitment to reduce fossil fuel dependence.  Indeed, leading the way on this important effort is intimately related to the mission of a great university.  In fact it is paramount that we, the University, set an example for our students on being ecologically sustainable. 

 

            Another precondition for genuine sustainability is the adoption of practices that dramatically reduce waste.  At present, Penn State continually receives products from distant sources, consumes these products, and then funnels enormous quantities of waste to distant landfills.  Instead Penn State needs, as a component of its long-term ecological mission, the clear intent to minimize solid, liquid and hazardous wastes.             

            A comprehensive ecological mission for Penn State would also include long-term targets in the realms of water conservation, land stewardship, low-impact transportation, sustainable food production, and "green" building construction.

 

            Of course, all of us in the Penn State community recognize that there will be up-front costs involved in doing such things as reducing dependence on fossil fuels, promoting zero-waste technologies, and constructing "green" buildings, but we also know that waste is expensive and that up-front investments in sustainable practices might pay off over the long-term, especially if environmental and social costs were calculated and educational benefits were tallied.  

 

            Another major result of the University adopting a policy and actions in regards to sustainability is the impact on students.  Indeed, some would say that this is the most important outcome.  If the University sets an example of sustainability it would be a powerful role model for our students and greatly multiply the effects of the undertaking.  Graduates having experienced living in such an environment while attending Penn State will carry this orientation with them throughout their lives and influence other individuals and organizations.

 

RATIONALE

 

            There is a need for Penn State to develop long term goals in regards to ecological sustainability and to incorporate them into the University’s Strategic Plan.  These goals would encourage all sectors of the University to explore resource-use options that are more conserving, healthful, and efficient.  It is our sincere hope that the Faculty Senate will endorse the recommendation listed below which supports the Green Destiny Council's general ecological mission policy statement.  By doing so, we will set an example for our students and society on how to meet the many environmental challenges of today and in the future.  Supporting ecological sustainability will not only promote environmental improvements within the University and Pennsylvania, but also economic health.  As Senator Gaylord Nelson put it, “the environment is the economy.”  By adopting a strong position on these issues, our University will stand out as a leader on this front.  This leadership role will attract students, faculty and funding for the University in addition to enhancing Pennsylvania’s reputation with regard to environmental stewardship.

 

RECOMMENDATION

 

The Faculty Senate hereby recommends that Penn State incorporate, to the fullest extent possible, the following LONG-TERM GOALS into all future University Strategic Plans.

           

 

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNIVERSITY PLANNING

P. Richard Althouse

William J. Anderson, Jr.

Anthony J. Baratta, V-Chair

Michael J. Cardamone

David Chao

Peter Deines, Chair

Peter B. Everett

William M. Frank

Daniel R. Hagen

Ali R. Hurson

Ernest W. Johnson

Daniel G. Kiefer

Rodney Kirsch

Robert N. Pangborn

Louise E. Sandmeyer

Michael C. Saunders

Gary C. Schultz

Marley W. Watkins

Beno Weiss

Daniel E. Willis

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON ADMISSIONS, RECORDS,

SCHEDULING AND STUDENT AID

 

Reserved Spaces Program

 

(Informational Report)

 

            "Reserved Spaces" represent spaces at the University Park Campus reserved for eligible freshmen with special needs that cannot be met at non-University Park locations.  These spaces are generally for students whose predicted GPA's are below the cutoffs for regular fall admissions for University Park.

 

            In nearly all cases, students admitted at the University Park Campus through the Reserved Spaces Program meet the basic admission standards of the University.  In some instances, it is not possible to calculate a predicted GPA (there were 4 such cases in 2000).  This is sometimes the issue for an international student.  There are, on occasion, special circumstances that warrant dropping below the 2.00 minimum predicted GPA, although there were no cases of this in 2000 admissions.

 

            A large number of the reserved spaces (50% in 2000) are for specially talented students in such areas as athletics, the arts and the Blue Band.  Most of these students contribute uniquely both to the educational and cultural life of the entire University Park community.  Spaces are also reserved for veterans, those entering under the Educational Opportunity Program (EOP) and those entering the recently instituted College Assistance Migrant Program (CAMP).  These three groups, along with Arts and Architecture talent admits, are Senate approved.  Two other general classifications account for the remaining students admitted through the Reserved Spaces Program.  "Other Academic" admissions involve students granted entrance by the Office of Undergraduate Admissions' Admissions Review Committee, and students on ROTC scholarships.  Administrative admissions include athletes, members of the Blue Band, and a few additional administrative spaces.

 

            The first table contains data giving a profile of admissions through the Reserved Spaces Program for six of the years since the program began in 1984.  During this time, the approved maximum for the program has been reduced and the number actually admitted each year through the program has been below the approved limit.  In 2000, 5.81% of the entering fall semester freshman class at University Park was admitted through the Reserved Spaces Program.  This is a substantial reduction from 1984, both in absolute number and percentage of new freshmen.  The second table provides a distribution by category over the same six years.

 

            The third table indicates the distribution of admissions through the Reserved Spaces by admission category (predicted GPA) for each general classification.

 

            The last table displays the approved limits for Fall 2001 by specific category.  These limits are the same as those for 2000.

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON ADMISSIONS, RECORDS SCHEDULING AND STUDENT AID

           

Deborah F. Atwater

Kevin R. Cheesbrough

JoAnn Chirico, Chair

Lynn E. Drafall

Peter Georgopulos, Vice Chair

Anna Griswold

Geoffrey J. Harford

Terry P. Harrison

Amanda Hudnall

Victor Nistor

P. Peter Rebane

John J. Romano

J. James Wager

Roger P. Ware

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON FACULTY AFFAIRS

 

UniSCOPE 2000 Presentation

 

(Informational)

 

 

            As distributed at the September 12 Senate meeting, the UniSCOPE Learning Community has developed a “multidimensional model of scholarship for the 21st century.”  This report recognizes the three missions of the University – teaching, research, and service – as a continuum of scholarship.  The UniSCOPE model serves as a basis for identifying, assessing, and rewarding the types of scholarship in the University.

 

After the December Senate meeting, the Faculty Affairs Committee will review the UniSCOPE report, examine its implications in the promotion and tenure process, and report to the Faculty Senate.  For your information and access, the URL of the UniSCOPE report is:  http://www.cas.psu.edu/docs/CASPROF/keystone21/uniscope/default.htm

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON FACULTY AFFAIRS

Shelton S. Alexander

Syed S. Andaleeb

Kultegin Aydin

Ingrid M. Blood

Melvin Blumberg

Clay Calvert

Lynn A. Carpenter

Renee D. Diehl

James M. Donovan

Jacqueline P. Esposito

Dorothy H. Evensen

Veronique M. Foti

Margaret B. Goldman

Elizabeth A. Hanley

Ravinder Koul

Robert LaPorte

Sallie M. McCorkle

Louis Milakofsky, Chair

Victor Romero

William A. Rowe

Robert Secor

Jeffery M. Sharp

Stephen W. Stace

Kim C. Steiner

Valerie N. Stratton, V-Chair

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION

 

Summary of Student Petitions by College, Unit or Location

 

(Informational)

 

        The Senate through its committees has permitted students to petition for exceptions to the Senate academic rules found in the Academic Policies, Rules and Procedures for Students.  Implementation and exceptions to these policies are the responsibility of the Senate Committee on Undergraduate Education unless otherwise assigned to another standing committee.

 

        The committee regularly reports to the Senate on the type and number of student petition actions.  This report provides a summary of petitions over the last two years and their sources by colleges and campuses.

 

        The petition provides an opportunity for the student to receive consideration on extenuating circumstances affecting his/her progress.  It is composed of a petition letter and transcript from the student, supporting documents from advisors, instructors, physicians or other appropriate personnel and a review statement by the student’s dean or campus executive officer.  The final decision by the committee represents an effort to weigh the personal circumstances of the individual while maintaining the academic standards of the University.

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION

                       


Cheryl Achterberg                  

Richard L. Ammon                       

Theresa A. Balog              

Dawn G. Blasko             

Richard J. Bord                       

Ali Borhan                               

John J. Cahir                           

William J. Campbell                     

Paul F. Clark                           

Rebecca K. Corwin            

Cheng Don                  

M. Margaret Galligan                       

David J. Green

Lynn Hendrickson

Gary L. Hile

Larry J. Kuhns

Jamie M. Myers, Chair

Laura L. Pauley

Robert D. Ricketts, V-Chair

Thomas A. Seybert

Carol A. Smith

Jane S. Sutton

Eric R. White

Jenny Zhang        

 

SENATE COMMITTEE ON UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION

Summary of Student Petitions by Types

 

For The Period 08/01/98 – 07/31/99

 

 

                                                Submitted                        Granted                        Denied

 

                        Drop/Add                        754                        608                        146

 

                        Withdraw                        572                        508                    64

 

               Miscellaneous:

               Corrected Grades       31             31       0

               Other                 20     18               2

 

                                                Totals     1,377              1,165                         212

 

 

For The Period 08/01/99 – 07/31/00

                                                Submitted                        Granted                        Denied

 

                        Drop/Add                        840                        613                        227

 

                        Withdraw                        561                        424                  137

 

               Late Registration               286               284                  2

 

               Miscellaneous:

               Corrected Grades       46             45       1

               Other                 24     24               0

 

                                                Totals     1,757              1,390                        367

 

                       

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Submitted

 

Submitted

 

% Increase

 

Granted

Denied

 

 

 

1998-99

 

1999-00

 

in Petitions

 

 

 

Abington College

 

72

 

88

 

22%

 

48

40

Agricultural Sciences

 

43

 

61

 

42%

 

46

15

Altoona College

 

79

 

81

 

3%

 

60

21

Arts & Architecture

 

46

 

53

 

15%

 

44

9

Beaver Campus

 

7

 

7

 

0%

 

5

2

Behrend College

 

49

 

54